Code of Ethics
Ethical Framework for being ethically mindful and willing to be accountable
for the ethical basis of Good Practice.
In this statement the term ‘practitioner’ is used to refers to myself and my services. The term ‘client’ is used as a generic term to refer to the
recipient of any of these services. The client may be an individual, couple, family, group, organisation or other
specifiable social unit.
One of the
characteristics of contemporary society is the coexistence of different approaches to ethics. This statement
reflects this ethical diversity and supports practitioners being responsive to differences in client abilities, needs
and culture and taking account of variations between settings and service specialisations by considering:
● Values
● Principles
● Personal moral qualities
This selection of ways of expressing ethical commitments does not seek to invalidate other approaches. The
presentation of different ways of approaching ethics alongside each other in this statement is intended to draw
attention to the limitations of relying too heavily on any single ethical approach.
Ethical principles are well
suited to examining the justification for particular decisions and actions. However, reliance on principles alone
may detract from the importance of the practitioner’s personal qualities and their ethical significance in the therapeutic relationship.
The provision of contextually sensitive and appropriate services is also a
fundamental ethical concern. Variations in client needs and cultural diversity differences are often more easily
understood and responded to in terms of values. Therefore, professional values are becoming an increasingly
significant way of expressing ethical commitment.
Values
The fundamental values include a commitment to:
● Respecting human rights and dignity
● Protecting the safety of clients
● Ensuring the integrity of practitioner-client relationships
● Enhancing the quality of professional knowledge and its application
● Alleviating personal distress and suffering
● Fostering a sense of self that is meaningful to the person(s) concerned
● Increasing personal effectiveness
● Enhancing the quality of relationships between people
● Appreciating the variety of human experience and culture
● Striving for the fair and adequate provision of services
Values inform principles. They represent an important way of expressing a general ethical commitment that
becomes more precisely defined and action-orientated when expressed as a principle.
Ethical principles of coaching
Principles direct attention to important ethical responsibilities. Each principle is described below and
is followed by examples of good practice that have been developed in response to that principle.
Ethical decisions that are strongly supported by one or more of these principles without any contradiction from
others may be regarded as reasonably well founded. However, practitioners will encounter circumstances in
which it is impossible to reconcile all the applicable principles and choosing between principles may be
required. A decision or course of action does not necessarily become unethical merely because it is contentious
or other practitioners would have reached different conclusions in similar circumstances. A practitioner’s
obligation is to consider all the relevant circumstances with as much care as is reasonably possible and to be
appropriately accountable for decisions made.
Being trustworthy: honouring the trust placed in the practitioner (also referred to as fidelity)
Being trustworthy is regarded as fundamental to understanding and resolving ethical issues. Practitioners who
adopt this principle: act in accordance with the trust placed in them; strive to ensure that clients’ expectations
are ones that have reasonable prospects of being met; honour their agreements and promises; regard
confidentiality as an obligation arising from the client’s trust; restrict any disclosure of confidential information
about clients to furthering the purposes for which it was originally disclosed.
Autonomy: respect for the client’s right to be self-governing
This principle emphasises the importance of developing a client’s ability to be self-directing within therapy and
all aspects of life. Practitioners who respect their clients’ autonomy: ensure accuracy in any advertising or
information given in advance of services offered; seek freely given and adequately informed consent; emphasise
the value of voluntary participation in the services being offered; engage in explicit contracting in advance of
any commitment by the client; protect privacy; protect confidentiality; normally make any disclosures of
confidential information conditional on the consent of the person concerned; and inform the client in advance of
foreseeable conflicts of interest or as soon as possible after such conflicts become apparent. The principle of
autonomy opposes the manipulation of clients against their will, even for beneficial social ends.
Beneficence: a commitment to promoting the client’s well-being
The principle of beneficence means acting in the best interests of the client based on professional assessment. It
directs attention to working strictly within one’s limits of competence and providing services on the basis of
adequate training or experience. Ensuring that the client’s best interests are achieved requires systematic
monitoring of practice and outcomes by the best available means. It is considered important that research and
systematic reflection inform practice. There is an obligation to use regular and on-going supervision to enhance
the quality of the services provided and to commit to updating practice by continuing professional development.
An obligation to act in the best interests of a client may become paramount when working with clients whose
capacity for autonomy is diminished because of immaturity, lack of understanding, extreme distress, serious
disturbance or other significant personal constraints.
Non-maleficence: a commitment to avoiding harm to the client
Non-maleficence involves: avoiding sexual, financial, emotional or any other form of client
exploitation; avoiding incompetence or malpractice; not providing services when unfit to do so due to illness,
personal circumstances or intoxication. The practitioner has an ethical responsibility to strive to mitigate any
harm caused to a client even when the harm is unavoidable or unintended.
Justice: the fair and impartial treatment of all clients and the provision of adequate services
The principle of justice requires being just and fair to all clients and respecting their human rights and dignity. It
directs attention to considering conscientiously any legal requirements and obligations, and remaining alert to
potential conflicts between legal and ethical obligations. Justice in the distribution of services requires the
ability to determine impartially the provision of services for clients and the allocation of services between
clients. A commitment to fairness requires the ability to appreciate differences between people and to be
committed to equality of opportunity, and avoiding discrimination against people or groups contrary to their
legitimate personal or social characteristics. Practitioners have a duty to strive to ensure a fair provision services, accessible and appropriate to the needs of potential clients.
Self-respect: fostering the practitioner’s self-knowledge and care for self
The principle of self-respect means that the practitioner appropriately applies all the above principles
as entitlements for self. This includes seeking counselling or therapy and other opportunities for
personal development as required. There is an ethical responsibility to use supervision for appropriate
personal and professional support and development, and to seek training and other opportunities for
continuing professional development. The principle of self-respect encourages active engagement in
life-enhancing activities and relationships that are independent of relationships in coaching.
Personal moral qualities
The practitioner’s personal moral qualities are of the utmost importance to clients. Many of the
personal qualities considered important in the provision of services have an ethical or moral component and are
therefore considered as virtues or good personal qualities. It is inappropriate to prescribe that all practitioners
possess these qualities, since it is fundamental that these personal qualities are deeply rooted in the person
concerned and developed out of personal commitment rather than the requirement of an external authority.
Personal qualities to which practitioners are strongly encouraged to aspire include:
Empathy: the ability to communicate understanding of another person’s experience from that person’s
perspective.
Sincerity: a personal commitment to consistency between what is professed and what is done.
Integrity: commitment to being moral in dealings with others, personal straightforwardness, honesty and
coherence.
Resilience: the capacity to work with the client’s concerns without being personally diminished.
Respect: showing appropriate esteem to others and their understanding of themselves.
Humility: the ability to assess accurately and acknowledge one’s own strengths and weaknesses.
Competence: the effective deployment of the skills and knowledge needed to do what is required.
Fairness: the consistent application of appropriate criteria to inform decisions and actions.
Wisdom: possession of sound judgement that informs practice.
Courage: the capacity to act in spite of known fears, risks and uncertainty.
Conclusion
The challenge of working ethically means that practitioners will inevitably encounter situations where there
are competing obligations. In such situations it is tempting to retreat from all ethical analysis in order to escape
a sense of what may appear to be unresolvable ethical tension. These ethics are intended to be of assistance in
such circumstances by directing attention to the variety of ethical factors that may need to be taken
into consideration and to alternative ways of approaching ethics that may prove more useful. No statement
of ethics can totally alleviate the difficulty of making professional judgements in circumstances that may
be constantly changing and full of uncertainties. By accepting this statement of ethics, the practitioner is committing themselves to engaging with the challenge of
striving to be ethical, even when doing so involves making difficult decisions or acting courageously.
Guidance on good practice
Divine Serenity is committed to sustaining and advancing
good practice. This guidance on the essential elements of good practice has been written to take into account the
changing circumstances in which services are now being delivered, in particular:
● changes in the range of issues and levels of need presented by clients
● the growth in levels of expertise available from practitioners with the expansion in the availability of
training and consultative support/supervision
Variations in client needs and the diversity of settings within which services are
delivered have also been carefully considered. Clients vary in their requirements in order to communicate
effectively and to gain access to services. Ethically aware services strive to meet these needs and to avoid
excluding someone from receiving a service or lowering the quality of that service solely on the grounds of a
client’s learning difficulty or physical disability.
All practitioners
encounter the challenge of responding to the diversity of their clients and finding ways of working effectively
with them. This statement therefore responds to the complexity of delivering services in contemporary society by directing attention to significant issues that practitioners ought to consider
and resolve in the specific circumstances of their work.
The terms ‘practitioner’ and ‘client’ are used in the same way as defined above. Practitioners’ behaviour may vary from these guidelines provided the variation
is ethically justifiable; the client is supportive of the variation; it is demonstrably to the benefit of the client; and
that practitioners are willing to be appropriately accountable to people affected.
Providing a good standard of practice and care
All clients are entitled to good standards of practice and care from their practitioners. Good standards of practice and care require professional competence; good relationships with
clients and colleagues; and commitment to being ethically mindful through observance of professional ethics.
Good quality of care
1. Good quality of care requires competently delivered services that meet the client’s needs by practitioners
who are appropriately supported and accountable.
2. Practitioners should give careful consideration to the limitations of their training and experience and
work within these limits, taking advantage of available professional support. If work with
clients requires the provision of additional services operating in parallel with coaching, the availability of such services ought to be taken into account, as their absence may
constitute a significant limitation.
3. Good practice involves clarifying and agreeing the rights and responsibilities of both the practitioner and
client at appropriate points in their working relationship.
4. Dual relationships arise when the practitioner has two or more kinds of relationship concurrently with
a client, for example client and trainee, acquaintance and client, colleague and supervisee. The existence
of a dual relationship with a client is seldom neutral and can have a powerful beneficial or detrimental
impact that may not always be easily foreseeable. For these reasons practitioners are required to consider
the implications of entering into dual relationships with clients, to avoid entering into relationships that
are likely to be detrimental to clients, and to be readily accountable to clients and colleagues for any
dual relationships that occur.
5. Practitioners are advised to keep appropriate records of their work with clients unless there are good and
sufficient reasons for not keeping any records. All records should be accurate, respectful of clients and
colleagues and protected from unauthorised disclosure. Any records should be kept securely
and adequately protected from unauthorised intrusion or disclosure. Practitioners should take into
account their responsibilities and their clients’ rights under data protection legislation and any other
legal requirements.
6. Clients are entitled to competently delivered services that are periodically reviewed by the
practitioner. These reviews may be conducted, when appropriate, in consultation with clients,
supervisors, managers or other practitioners with relevant expertise.
Maintaining competent practice
7. All practitioners are required to have regular and
on-going formal supervision/consultative support for their work in accordance with professional
requirements.
8. Regularly monitoring and reviewing one’s work is essential to maintaining good practice. It is important
to be open to, and conscientious in considering, feedback from colleagues, appraisals and assessments.
Responding constructively to feedback helps to advance practice.
9. A commitment to good practice requires practitioners to keep up to date with the latest knowledge and
respond to changing circumstances. They should consider carefully their own need for
continuing professional development and engage in appropriate educational activities.
10. Practitioners should be aware of and understand any legal requirements concerning their work, consider
these conscientiously and be legally and professionally accountable for their practice.
Keeping trust
11. The practice of coaching depends on gaining and honouring the trust of
clients. Keeping trust requires:
• attentiveness to the quality of listening and respect offered to clients
• culturally appropriate ways of communicating that are courteous and clear
• respect for privacy and dignity
• careful attention to client consent and confidentiality
12. Clients should be adequately informed about the nature of the services being offered.
Practitioners should obtain adequately informed consent from their clients and respect a client’s right to
choose whether to continue or withdraw.
13. Practitioners should ensure that services are normally delivered on the basis of the client’s
explicit consent. Reliance on implicit consent is more vulnerable to misunderstandings and is best
avoided unless there are sound reasons for doing so. Overriding a client’s known wishes or consent is
a serious matter that requires adequate and reasoned justification. Practitioners should be prepared to be
readily accountable to clients and colleagues if they override a client’s known wishes.
14. Situations in which clients pose a risk of causing serious harm to themselves or others are
particularly challenging for the practitioner. These are situations in which the practitioner should be alert
to the possibility of conflicting responsibilities between those concerning their client, other people who
may be significantly affected, and society generally. Resolving conflicting responsibilities may require
due consideration of the context in which the service is being provided. Consultation with a supervisor
or experienced practitioner is strongly recommended, whenever this would not cause undue delay. In all
cases, the aim should be to ensure for the client a good quality of care that is as respectful of the client’s
capacity for self-determination and their trust as circumstances permit.
15. Practitioners should normally be willing to respond to their client’s requests for information about the
way that they are working and any assessment that they may have made. This professional requirement
may not apply if it is considered that imparting this information would be detrimental to the client or
inconsistent with the approach previously agreed with the client.
Clients may have legal rights to this information and these need to be taken into account.
16. Practitioners must not abuse their client’s trust in order to gain sexual, emotional, financial or any other
kind of personal advantage. Sexual relations with clients are prohibited. ‘Sexual relations’ include
intercourse, any other type of sexual activity or sexualised behaviour. Practitioners should think
carefully about, and exercise considerable caution before, entering into personal or
business relationships with former clients and should expect to be professionally accountable if the
relationship becomes detrimental to the client or the standing of the profession.
17. Practitioners should not allow their professional relationships with clients to be prejudiced by any
personal views they may hold about lifestyle, gender, age, disability, race, sexual orientation, beliefs or
culture.
18. Practitioners should be clear about any commitment to be available to clients and colleagues and honour
these commitments.
Respecting privacy and confidentiality
19. Respecting clients’ privacy and confidentiality are fundamental requirements for keeping trust
and respecting client autonomy. The professional management of confidentiality concerns the
protection of personally identifiable and sensitive information from unauthorised disclosure. Disclosure
may be authorised by client consent or the law. Any disclosures of client confidences should be
undertaken in ways that best protect the client’s trust and respect client autonomy.
20. Communications made on the basis of client consent do not constitute a breach of confidentiality. Client
consent is the ethically preferred way of resolving any dilemmas over confidentiality.
21. Exceptional circumstances may prevent the practitioner from seeking client consent to a breach of
confidence due to the urgency and seriousness of the situation, for example, preventing the client
causing serious harm to self or others. In such circumstances the practitioner has an ethical responsibility
to act in ways which balance the client’s right to confidentiality against the need to communicate with
others. Practitioners should expect to be ethically accountable for any breach of confidentiality.
Teaching and training
22. Confidential information about clients may be shared within teams where the client has consented or
knowingly accepted a service on this basis; the information can be adequately protected
from unauthorised further disclosures; and the disclosure enhances the quality of service available
to clients or improves service delivery.
23. Practitioners should be willing to be accountable to their clients and to their profession for
their management of confidentiality in general and particularly for any disclosures made without their
client’s consent. Good records of existing policy and practice and of situations where the practitioner
has breached confidentiality without client consent, greatly assist ethical accountability. In some
situations the law forbids the practitioner informing the client that confidential information has been
passed to the authorities, nonetheless the practitioner remains ethically accountable to colleagues and
the profession.
24. Practitioners who provide formal education and training should acquire the skills, attitudes
and knowledge required to be competent teachers and facilitators of learning in their subject.
25. Practitioners are required to be fair, accurate and honest in their assessments of their students.
26. Prior consent is required from clients if they are to be observed, recorded or if their
personally identifiable disclosures are to be used for training purposes.
27. All training should model standards and practice consistent with those
expected of practitioners in the role for which the training is being provided.
28. All trainers and educators have a responsibility to protect
the standards of the profession. Trainers are responsible for taking reasonable steps to prevent
clients being exposed to risk or harm by trainees.
29. Where information is held by more than one person involved in the assessment of a trainee, it should
normally be shared to produce the fairest possible evaluation of the person concerned. Any
confidentiality agreements between trainers and trainees ought to be established in ways that permit the
appropriate sharing of information for assessment and the protection of clients.
Supervising and managing
30. Practitioners are responsible for clarifying who holds responsibility for the work with the client.
31. There is a general obligation for all practitioners to
receive supervision/consultative support independently of any managerial relationships.
32. Supervisors and managers have a responsibility to maintain and enhance good practice by practitioners,
to protect clients from poor practice and to acquire the attitudes, skills and knowledge required by their
role.
33. Supervisors and managers may form a triangular relationship with a practitioner, particularly where services are being provided within an agency. All parties to this
relationship have a responsibility to clarify their expectations of each other and, in particular, the steps
that ought to be taken to address any concerns over client safety. The role of an independent supervisor
is widely considered to be desirable in promoting good practice but, to be most effective, requires clarity
in how such a role relates to line management and the division of tasks and responsibilities between
a supervisor and any line manager.
Fitness to practice
34. Practitioners have a responsibility to monitor and maintain their fitness to practice at a level that enables
them to provide an effective service. If their effectiveness becomes impaired for any reason, including
health or personal circumstances, they should seek the advice of their supervisor, experienced colleagues
or line manager and, if necessary, withdraw from practice until their fitness to practice returns. Suitable
arrangements should be made for clients who are adversely affected.
If things go wrong with clients
35. Practitioners should respond promptly and appropriately to any complaint received from their
clients.
36. Practitioners should endeavour to remedy any harm they may have caused to their clients and to prevent
any further harm. An apology may be the appropriate response.
37. Practitioners should discuss, with their supervisor, manager or other experienced practitioner(s),
the circumstances in which they may have harmed a client in order to ensure that the appropriate
steps have been taken to mitigate any harm and to prevent any repetition.
38. Practitioners are strongly encouraged to ensure that their work is adequately covered by insurance
for professional indemnity and liability.
39. If practitioners consider that they have acted in accordance with good practice but their client is
not satisfied that this is the case, they may wish to use independent dispute resolution, for
example: seeking a second professional opinion, mediation, or conciliation where this is both
appropriate and practical.
Responsibilities to all clients
40. Practitioners have a responsibility to protect clients when they have good reason for believing that other
practitioners are placing them at risk of harm.
41. They should raise their concerns with the practitioner concerned in the first instance, unless it
is inappropriate to do so. If the matter cannot be resolved, they should review the grounds for
their concern and the evidence available to them and, when appropriate, raise their concerns with
the practitioner’s manager, agency or professional body.
42. If they are uncertain what to do, their concerns should be discussed with an experienced colleague or a supervisor.
Awareness of Context
43. The practitioner is responsible for learning about and taking account of the different
protocols, conventions and customs that can pertain to different working contexts and cultures.
44. All routine referrals to colleagues and other services should be discussed with the client in advance and
the client’s consent obtained both to making the referral and also to disclosing information
to accompany the referral. Reasonable care should be taken to ensure that:
45. the recipient of the referral is able to provide the required service;
• any confidential information disclosed during the referral process will be adequately protected;
• the referral will be likely to benefit the client.
46. Prior to accepting a referral the practitioner should give careful consideration to:
• the appropriateness of the referral;
• the likelihood that the referral will be beneficial to the client;
• the adequacy of the client’s consent for the referral.
Probity in professional ethics
Ensuring the probity of practice is important both to those who are directly affected but also to
the standing of the profession as a whole.
Providing clients with adequate information
47. Practitioners are responsible for clarifying the terms on which their services are being offered in advance
of the client incurring any financial obligation or other reasonably foreseeable costs or liabilities.
48. All information about services should be honest, accurate, avoid unjustifiable claims, and be consistent
with maintaining the good standing of the profession.
49. Particular care should be taken over the integrity of presenting qualifications, accreditation
and professional standing.
Financial arrangements
50. Practitioners are required to be honest, straightforward and accountable in all financial matters
concerning their clients and other professional relationships.
Conflicts of interest
51. Conflicts of interest are best avoided, provided they can be reasonably foreseen in the first instance
and prevented from arising. In deciding how to respond to conflicts of interest, the protection of the
client’s interests and maintaining trust in the practitioner should be paramount.
Care of self as a practitioner
Attending to the practitioner’s well-being is essential to sustaining good practice.
52. Practitioners have a responsibility to themselves to ensure that their work does not become
detrimental to their health or well-being by ensuring that the way that they undertake their work
is as safe as possible and that they seek appropriate professional support and services as the
need arises.
53. Practitioners are entitled to be treated with proper consideration and respect that is consistent with
this Guidance.